Income Inequality by State: Where the Gap Between Rich and Poor Is Widest

How we make these: our editorial software drafts each piece from the data on this site. Figures in this piece were checked against the site's data before publishing. Read about the desk.

The U.S. Gini coefficient hit 0.485 in 2026, the highest in 50 years. But the national number hides enormous variation between states. Where you live determines how unequal your neighbors' incomes really are.

The U.S. Gini coefficient reached 0.485 in 2026, the highest level recorded in half a century, according to the Census Bureau. That single number masks a reality where some states look more like Scandinavia and others resemble developing economies.

What the Gini Coefficient Actually Measures

The Gini coefficient runs from 0 to 1. A score of 0 means perfect equality, every household earns the same. A score of 1 means one household earns everything.

The U.S. sits at 0.485 nationally, but individual states range from roughly 0.42 to over 0.52. That spread is wide enough to matter in real, measurable ways, from median household income to poverty rates to housing costs.

The coefficient captures pre-tax and post-tax income differently depending on the data source. The Census Bureau figures most commonly cited use post-transfer, pre-tax income, which means they include Social Security and unemployment payments but exclude tax credits. States with aggressive progressive income taxes often look more equal after taxes than the Gini alone suggests.

The Most Unequal States

New York consistently ranks as the most unequal state, with a Gini coefficient around 0.513 (as of late 2025, the most recent state-level data available). New York City drives this figure hard. The top 20% of earners in the metro area take home roughly 17 times what the bottom 20% earns.

Connecticut and Louisiana follow closely. Connecticut's inequality comes from the top end: Fairfield County hedge fund wealth sits alongside some of the poorest cities in New England. Louisiana's inequality is driven from the bottom, with one of the highest poverty rates in the country at around 18.6%.

California sits at approximately 0.499. The state's high nominal incomes in tech and finance obscure extreme poverty concentrated in the Central Valley and parts of Los Angeles. Silicon Valley households earning $400,000 a year live in the same state as farmworkers earning $28,000. If you want to see how California's tax structure interacts with this gap, our breakdown of Florida vs. California: The Tax Reality runs the numbers directly.

Other notably unequal states include:

Florida: Gini around 0.489. Tourism and service-sector wages at the bottom, retiree wealth and finance at the top.
Massachusetts: Gini near 0.486. Boston's biotech and finance sectors have pulled the top far from the median.
Texas: Gini around 0.484. No state income tax benefits high earners disproportionately. For a direct comparison with New York, see Texas vs. New York: What You Actually Keep.

The Most Equal States

Utah is the most equal state in the country, with a Gini near 0.419. A strong labor market, relatively affordable housing outside Salt Lake City, and a younger demographic skew contribute to compressed income distribution.

Alaska, Iowa, and New Hampshire also rank among the most equal. Alaska's permanent fund dividend, paid to all residents, mechanically reduces inequality at the lower end of the distribution. New Hampshire has no income tax and no sales tax, but its equality comes from a genuinely compressed wage structure rather than redistribution.

Wyoming and South Dakota, both no-income-tax states, have Gini scores in the 0.43 to 0.44 range. Their relative equality reflects smaller populations and fewer ultra-high-income households, not progressive policy.

Why State Tax Policy Shapes the Gap

State tax structures are one of the most direct policy levers affecting post-tax inequality. Progressive income taxes in states like California and New York theoretically compress the income distribution, but the pre-tax inequality in those states is severe enough that taxes alone cannot close the gap.

Property taxes create a different dynamic. States with high effective property tax rates, like New Jersey at 2.13% or Illinois at 1.73%, extract more from wealth held in real estate, which can reduce measured inequality or simply push lower-income homeowners out entirely.

Capital gains treatment matters enormously for top earners. States that tax capital gains as ordinary income hit the top of the distribution harder. See our full breakdown at Capital Gains Tax by State: A Full Breakdown.

For retirees specifically, income inequality interacts directly with how states treat Social Security and pension income. States that exempt retirement income effectively reduce the tax burden on fixed-income households, which can narrow the post-tax gap at the lower end.

Use our state comparison calculator to see how your income would be taxed in the most and least equal states.

Key Takeaways

The U.S. Gini coefficient is 0.485 in 2026, a 50-year high. New York leads state-level inequality at approximately 0.513, while Utah is the most equal state at roughly 0.419.
States with extreme inequality tend to have either very high top earners (New York, Connecticut, California) or very high poverty rates (Louisiana, Mississippi), and sometimes both.
Tax policy narrows the gap somewhat but does not reverse it. California has a 13.3% top marginal income tax rate and still ranks among the five most unequal states in the country.

Compare how income inequality, tax burden, and cost of living stack up in any two states side by side at liveordiehere.com.

Sources

Where to confirm these figures

These are the official and primary publishers for the topics in this guide. Check a figure against them before you act on it; laws and rates change, and their current page wins over ours.